Inserting former Wall Road Journal reporter John Carreyrou on the potential witness listing by former Theranos head Elizabeth Holmes for her trial is a “ruse” to maintain him from reporting on the case, based on a submitting by his attorneys, experiences Sara Ashley O’Brien of CNN Enterprise.
O’Brien experiences, “In a court docket submitting Friday, his attorneys say ‘it stays fully unclear whether or not or why Holmes would truly wish to name Carreyrou to the stand,’ they usually’re chalking it as much as a ‘ruse’ to maintain Carreyrou from protecting the story by way of his podcast.
“Holmes has refused to take away him as a attainable witness or, alternatively, to exempt him from the exclusion and gag orders that may apply to sure witnesses, based on the submitting. This, based on his attorneys, is an try and doubtlessly preserve the journalist out of the courtroom and from reporting firsthand on the high-profile case alongside different media.
“Now, his attorneys need the court docket to clarify that, if he’s subpoenaed, the exclusion order (which prevents some witnesses from being contained in the courtroom throughout different witness testimonies), or the gag order (which precludes them from talking about their testimonies past their attorneys), wouldn’t apply to Carreyrou.
“His attorneys are asking the court docket to think about his First Modification rights to cowl the trial, in addition to for readability on what testimony could also be sought if he’s known as as a witness. An legal professional for Holmes didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.”
Learn extra right here.