Mark Zuckerberg, chief government officer and founding father of Fb Inc., speaks throughout a Home Vitality and Commerce Committee listening to in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, April 11, 2018.
Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Photographs
Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday lastly addressed the sequence of claims made by whistleblower Frances Haugen, denying that the social media firm prioritizes its income over the security of its customers.
“On the coronary heart of those accusations is this concept that we prioritize revenue over security and well-being,” Zuckerberg mentioned in a submit on his Fb profile. “That is simply not true.”
Zuckerberg’s feedback come after almost a month of experiences out of the Wall Road Journal which have relied on inner Fb analysis offered to the publication by Haugen, who left the social media firm in Might. The tales have highlighted quite a few issues on Fb’s companies that the corporate is conscious of however both ignores or doesn’t resolve. This contains analysis that exhibits Fb is conscious that Instagram is detrimental to the psychological well being of youngsters.
“Of all the pieces printed, I am significantly centered on the questions raised about our work with children,” Zuckerberg mentioned. “I’ve spent a number of time reflecting on the sorts of experiences I need my children and others to have on-line, and it is crucial to me that all the pieces we construct is protected and good for youths.”
Zuckerberg’s submit comes after Haugen spent Tuesday morning on Capitol Hill testifying earlier than senators on each side of the aisles on the issues the social media firm creates for society.
With out referring to Haugen, Zuckerberg mentioned “most of the claims do not make any sense.” Zuckerberg additionally mentioned that “The argument that we intentionally push content material that makes individuals offended for revenue is deeply illogical.”
Zuckerberg additionally referred to as on Congress to replace web rules that decide what age teenagers ought to be allowed to make use of web companies, how tech corporations ought to confirm customers’ ages and the way corporations ought to stability giving children privateness whereas giving mother and father visibility to their kids’s on-line exercise.
“Much like balancing different social points, I do not imagine non-public corporations ought to make all the selections on their very own,” he wrote. “That is why we have now advocated for up to date web rules for a number of years now.”